Conclusions for Software Evaluation

Here are the conclusions I drew after evaluating Greenstone Digital Library Software.

Overall, this evaluation has examined the utility of Greenstone Digital Library Software for the creation of a digital repository at the University of Western Ontario. As a large, academic institution, Western has many factors to consider when choosing appropriate software. Primarily this evaluation focused on how well Greenstone performs in terms of functionality, reliability, usability and support services. In terms of these issues, Greenstone seems to rate fairly successfully. With the exception of preserving metadata, Greenstone appears to function effectively as an open source option for libraries to build their own digital repositories for the benefit and use of administrators and patrons. However, attractive features and ease of use are not all that matters. This evaluation has also highlighted the practical implications Western will have to consider before deciding whether to adopt Greenstone as a software option. Issues of cost, time, staff and support may place limitations on Western’s ability to use Greenstone to meet their objectives. Thus, before selecting any software, Western needs to perform a needs assessment to be certain whatever program they choose is right for them as well as an evaluation of their resources to be sure they have the requirements to use such a program. If practical considerations are not made first it is likely such a venture into open source digital repository software will fail at high cost of time and money for the institution regardless of the quality of the software.